<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Microphone Fire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the Message? by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=69#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=69#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Wishes for a new Mike's webpage update about new uni, brisbananahome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wishes for a new Mike&#8217;s webpage update about new uni, brisbananahome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the Message? by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=69#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=69#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Maybe one day it will regulate itself somehow and find an equilibrium state. That is, only after the web grows out of it's ADD 'entertain me NOW!' attitude. Ps: I is also guilty of that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe one day it will regulate itself somehow and find an equilibrium state. That is, only after the web grows out of it&#8217;s ADD &#8216;entertain me NOW!&#8217; attitude. Ps: I is also guilty of that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the Message? by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=69#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=69#comment-69</guid>
		<description>With such a user heavy dependent and unregulated 'eco'system, should we no be worried about mediation, facts checking, validity of info? Then again, I saw a lecture commenting on the quality of old school encyclopedia articles, which made them sound just a dodgey as any old web opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With such a user heavy dependent and unregulated &#8216;eco&#8217;system, should we no be worried about mediation, facts checking, validity of info? Then again, I saw a lecture commenting on the quality of old school encyclopedia articles, which made them sound just a dodgey as any old web opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the Message? by Mike Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=69#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=69#comment-66</guid>
		<description>When McLuhan said "The medium is the message" he I think he meant that we should be looking at what mediums we consume. That it is not what we are watching on TV that is important, but the fact that we are sitting in a darkened room with our family silently watching moving images and listening to the dialogue. 

&lt;strong&gt;But then I read your comment and it makes a lot of sense&lt;/strong&gt;. It's like a micro application of McLuhan's idea. I think he might interpret art as one medium (I have no basis for this theory) But within art each of the mediums is, tautologically (yes I did need to look that word up) a medium, and each one has a separate message. I guess there must be different layers. Eg with a computer, there is the medium of the computer, which contains the medium of the web browser, MSN and iTunes, for example. 

 But art goes a step further and crystallises these medium choices. The artist has to think about what medium is the best expression of their idea. At least that's my opinion. 

Now you've made me think too much...

Twitter is easy and cool. it is facebook statuses without facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When McLuhan said &#8220;The medium is the message&#8221; he I think he meant that we should be looking at what mediums we consume. That it is not what we are watching on TV that is important, but the fact that we are sitting in a darkened room with our family silently watching moving images and listening to the dialogue. </p>
<p><strong>But then I read your comment and it makes a lot of sense</strong>. It&#8217;s like a micro application of McLuhan&#8217;s idea. I think he might interpret art as one medium (I have no basis for this theory) But within art each of the mediums is, tautologically (yes I did need to look that word up) a medium, and each one has a separate message. I guess there must be different layers. Eg with a computer, there is the medium of the computer, which contains the medium of the web browser, MSN and iTunes, for example. </p>
<p> But art goes a step further and crystallises these medium choices. The artist has to think about what medium is the best expression of their idea. At least that&#8217;s my opinion. </p>
<p>Now you&#8217;ve made me think too much&#8230;</p>
<p>Twitter is easy and cool. it is facebook statuses without facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the Message? by Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=69#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=69#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike, i stumbled onto this wonderful blog of yours. Great Interface! (wow i never get to use that word!)  
People like us who were subjected to hsc art major works should know all about media as the message. Your 'light in a box' could not have been more different from my 'painted boxes'. Right away the message was unique to each media (medium?)
Anyway, keep it up, and i'm going to need ur assistance at some point with this twitter thingy. wtf?
Love ya Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike, i stumbled onto this wonderful blog of yours. Great Interface! (wow i never get to use that word!)<br />
People like us who were subjected to hsc art major works should know all about media as the message. Your &#8216;light in a box&#8217; could not have been more different from my &#8216;painted boxes&#8217;. Right away the message was unique to each media (medium?)<br />
Anyway, keep it up, and i&#8217;m going to need ur assistance at some point with this twitter thingy. wtf?<br />
Love ya Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twinkle Twinkle Little Neighbor by Paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=52#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=52#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I think I agree with both Meike and Sam. 

On one hand, *practical* use of this software for the average person is basically an oxymoron, seeing as the average person would find random IMs from strangers *im*practical and unnecessary.

The techie in me however says that Twinkle sounds neat, if only inasmuch as it would be interesting to intercept stray but also localized bits of the IMiverse, on the off chance that one of them would be something substantial. 

Imagine standing in front of a mural on a busy street and getting a twit that says "I'm waiting in front of the mural on 4th street. It's really cool." and suppose you could answer the person? Strike up a conversation, maybe if only to share your thoughts on the artwork? How neat would that be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I agree with both Meike and Sam. </p>
<p>On one hand, *practical* use of this software for the average person is basically an oxymoron, seeing as the average person would find random IMs from strangers *im*practical and unnecessary.</p>
<p>The techie in me however says that Twinkle sounds neat, if only inasmuch as it would be interesting to intercept stray but also localized bits of the IMiverse, on the off chance that one of them would be something substantial. </p>
<p>Imagine standing in front of a mural on a busy street and getting a twit that says &#8220;I&#8217;m waiting in front of the mural on 4th street. It&#8217;s really cool.&#8221; and suppose you could answer the person? Strike up a conversation, maybe if only to share your thoughts on the artwork? How neat would that be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twinkle Twinkle Little Neighbor by Mike Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=52#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=52#comment-15</guid>
		<description>typical non nerds, never understand how cool these things are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>typical non nerds, never understand how cool these things are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twinkle Twinkle Little Neighbor by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=52#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=52#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I find it fascinating as you do, but I think we're alone here. Meike just told me all about how stupid that sounds. Still, that's just one other person's opinion. Although I think she speaks for the majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it fascinating as you do, but I think we&#8217;re alone here. Meike just told me all about how stupid that sounds. Still, that&#8217;s just one other person&#8217;s opinion. Although I think she speaks for the majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear You, Love, Me. by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=32#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=32#comment-12</guid>
		<description>You need to advertise your site more. At least I will comment to add you comments count up to 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to advertise your site more. At least I will comment to add you comments count up to 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear You, Love, Me. by Janek</title>
		<link>http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=32#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Janek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/?p=32#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I think there are various standards involved, based on familiarity definitely as well.

The lecturers in my department are quite casual, so generally emails are "Hi Howard.... Regards, John". I find I sign most emails with a form of Regards, sometimes Warm, Kind, or Best. If I'm taking someone, it's usually Cheers. There was a letter in smh a few months ago where someone said 'Regards' is Austin-esque, but this was then corrected by someone who said that she didn't use that sign-off, ever.

Facebook I generally sign with a 'J', and possibly a :), x or two. Texts, I will generally leave unsigned, but might xx to my boyfriend or mother.

I think we all just work with whom we're talking to, and then adjust our styles appropriately.

On this topic, there is actually a PhD comic atm (http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1047) which notes how sometimes communicating with lecturers can end up...

J :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are various standards involved, based on familiarity definitely as well.</p>
<p>The lecturers in my department are quite casual, so generally emails are &#8220;Hi Howard&#8230;. Regards, John&#8221;. I find I sign most emails with a form of Regards, sometimes Warm, Kind, or Best. If I&#8217;m taking someone, it&#8217;s usually Cheers. There was a letter in smh a few months ago where someone said &#8216;Regards&#8217; is Austin-esque, but this was then corrected by someone who said that she didn&#8217;t use that sign-off, ever.</p>
<p>Facebook I generally sign with a &#8216;J&#8217;, and possibly a :), x or two. Texts, I will generally leave unsigned, but might xx to my boyfriend or mother.</p>
<p>I think we all just work with whom we&#8217;re talking to, and then adjust our styles appropriately.</p>
<p>On this topic, there is actually a PhD comic atm (http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1047) which notes how sometimes communicating with lecturers can end up&#8230;</p>
<p>J <img src='http://www.microphonefire.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
